So let me preface this by saying I hate losing. Losing sucks. Watching your favorite team go down can be just as crappy as taking a dump in a public bathroom only to realize that there is no toilet paper left when you need to wipe. But sometimes losing can be necessary.
Right now I just want the Sabres to lose. Take your lumps this year and get a #1-3 pick that will make an impact and be a great player. Why not. There has been nothing this year to show contention and with the season almost half way over things look bleak. There is a side note here. A magical 8-10 game win streak I'll take and then I'll change my mind but unless I see that I don't care.
Now I know you're going to give me the "how can you root for your team to lose, you should always want them to win." Yes, you're right. I should. When it's feasible and playoff runs are possible. If you're one of those people who always wants their team to try their hardest and will still pay a lot of money for tickets when the team sucks you're just encouraging mediocrity. You're basically a father who's son gets a medal for 7th place and you take him out for ice cream and tell him how special he is for trying. Don't get me wrong I'll watch the team on TV for free but I'm not about to pay $55-$75 for a ticket to see a team who more than likely will disappoint me.
If my team can't win I want the best pick possible. I want the team to improve more quickly, and a better quality player from the draft will help this occur faster. If you still pay for games when you know the team is bad then all you're doing is perpetuating the system. Sports are business. If the product sucks people don't go and the business doesn't make money. This prompts the owners to make changes and put people in charge who will make decisions that create wins. If you still have dumb, blind faith in the team when they are bad and continue to pump money into the team you give ownership no reason to make changes that might improve the team. Basically you help the team continue to be mediocre. This goes for any professional team you support.
I realize that you can find quality players everywhere in a draft for any sport that can make a team better. I'd just rather be safer with a top 5 pick than #9 or #12. What's the difference anyways? Both picks don't make the playoffs for any professional sport so does it really matter? Wouldn't I want the safer, more talented pick? Look at the Penguins, they were dirt and then had the #1 and #2 picks and boom Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin. Look at the Washington Nationals in baseball. Strasburg and Harper will be dominant for years barring injury.
Let's look at the NHL's past #1 picks. 2012 Nail Yakupov, 2011 Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, 2010 Taylor Hall, 2009 John Taveres, 2008 Steven Stamkos, 2007 Patrick Kane, 2006 Erik Johnson, 2005 Sidney Crosby, 2004 Alex Ovechkin, 2003 Marc-Andre Fleury, 2002 Rick Nash, 2001 Ilya Kovalchuck. Looks safe to me.
Let me know if you disagree but I would have rather had a shot (2008) #1 Jake Long, #2 Chris Long, #3 Matt Ryan, #4 Darren McFadden or #5 Glenn Dorsey than #11 Leodis McKelvin...